Rtx 2060 Vs Gtx 1070 Ti
Price now 370$ Games supported 99% Cost now 428$ Games supported 99% Comparing of graphics card architecture, market place segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for coin To become the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base of operations clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you lot accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Data on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (ability supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of organisation RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise merely for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may modify the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if y'all need some particular engineering science for your purposes. APIs supported, including item versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark functioning comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if y'all find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we ordinarily fix bug quickly. This is probably the well-nigh ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing iv split benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last existence done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used 4 tests based on ii scenes, ane being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded past Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX xi feature level 10 criterion that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Water ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Nighttime Raid. Criterion coverage: fourteen% Burn Strike is a DirectX xi benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly fabricated of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Grouping. Benchmark coverage: 9% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Storm was used to measure out entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX eleven feature level 9 to brandish a boxing betwixt two space fleets almost a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Nighttime Raid. Criterion coverage: 8% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics bill of fare benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics menu benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: five% Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Item gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Hither are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: −87.8% +87.8% −61.2% +61.two% −196% +196% −176% +176% +four.3% −4.iii% +10.7% −10.vii% +5.nine% −v.nine% −186% +186% +4.3% −four.3% −106% +106% −108% +108% −118% +118% −106% +106% −59.two% +59.two% −thirty.vi% +30.half-dozen% −163% +163% −141% +141% +iv.3% −4.3% +nine.1% −9.1% +6.ii% −vi.2% −167% +167% +4.three% −4.three% −59.ii% +59.2% −1.5% +1.5% −14.3% +14.iii% −129% +129% −178% +178% −77.6% +77.6% +12.five% −12.5% −12.2% +12.2% −vii.ii% +vii.two% +4.3% −4.three% +8.five% −8.5% +v.7% −5.vii% −5% +5% −one.4% +i.4% +eight.nine% −8.9% −55.one% +55.1% +iv.3% −4.three% −vi.1% +half-dozen.i% −5% +5% +40% −forty% +eight.5% −8.5% +2.i% −2.1% +sixteen.seven% −sixteen.seven% +76.half dozen% −76.6% +4.three% −iv.3% +59.six% −59.six% +0% +0% +72.3% −72.3% +63.3% −63.3% +14% −14% +4.3% −4.3% +63.3% −63.3% −4% +4% +104% −104% −14.three% +14.3% −8.v% +8.5% −3.seven% +3.seven% +104% −104% −12.eight% +12.8% +4.three% −4.iii% −v.ane% +five.1% +0% +0% −seven.three% +7.3% +188% −188% Technical City couldn't decide betwixt NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 The differences in performance seem too modest. Should yous nonetheless have questions concerning choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Exercise you lot think we are right or mistaken in our option? Vote past clicking "Like" button most your favorite graphics card. The nearest GeForce GTX 1070 Ti'due south AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 64, which is faster past 1% and higher by 3 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1070 Ti: We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2060 from AMD is Radeon RX 6600, which is nigh equal in speed and higher by one position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2060: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with operation more than or less close to those reviewed, providing yous with more than options to consider. Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, equally well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of i to five: Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of ane to v: Hither you tin ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSGTX 1070 Ti vs RTX 2060
Full general info
Place in functioning rating 76 83 Value for money 56.74 53.84 Compages Pascal (2016−2021) Turing (2018−2021) GPU code name Pascal GP104 Turing TU106 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release appointment 2 Nov 2017 (four years ago) six January 2019 (3 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $399 $349 Price now $370 (0.9x MSRP) $428 (1.2x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2432 no data Core clock speed 1607 MHz no data Boost clock speed 1683 MHz no data Number of transistors 7,200 million 10,800 million Manufacturing process technology xvi nm 12 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 180 Watt no data Texture fill rate 255.8 201.6 Floating-point operation 8,186 gflops no data Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe three.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 267 mm 229 mm Width two-slot no data Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin no data Retentiveness
Memory type GDDR5 no data Maximum RAM amount 8 GB no data Retentivity jitney width 256 Bit no data Retentiveness clock speed 8000 MHz no data Memory bandwidth 256.3 GB/s no data Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort no information HDMI + no data Thousand-SYNC support + + Technologies
API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) no data Shader Model 6.4 6.5 OpenGL 4.half-dozen no information OpenCL 1.ii no information Vulkan ane.2.131 1.2.131 CUDA 6.1 seven.5 Benchmark functioning
Overall score
Gaming performance
Full Hard disk drive 111 120 1440p 72 76 4K 53 fifty Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 45−fifty 45−50 Full Hard disk
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 92 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 45−fifty 79 Battleground v 45−fifty 145 Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 45−fifty 135 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50 Far Weep 5 114 103 Far Cry New Dawn 107 101 Forza Horizon 4 45−l 140 Hitman iii 45−50 45−l Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 101 Cherry-red Dead Redemption ii 45−fifty 102 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 107 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 101 Full Hard disk drive
High Preset
Assassinator'southward Creed Odyssey 45−fifty 78 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−l 64 Battlefield 5 45−50 129 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 118 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50 Far Weep 5 108 99 Far Cry New Dawn 103 97 Forza Horizon iv 45−fifty 131 Hitman three 45−50 45−50 Horizon Nix Dawn 45−50 78 Metro Exodus 66 67 Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 56 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42 96 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 136 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 87 Total Hard disk drive
Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 63 56 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 55 Battlefield 5 111 119 Cyberpunk 2077 45−l 45−50 Far Weep five 102 94 Far Cry New Dawn 93 88 Forza Horizon 4 100 105 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 73 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 45 1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−l 76 Hitman 3 45−50 45−50 Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 52 Metro Exodus 40 42 Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 35 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51 45−50 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 48 45−50 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 42 Battlefield five 83 45−50 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50 Far Cry 5 75 45−l Far Weep New Dawn 76 76 Forza Horizon four 81 45−l Lookout Dogs: Legion 45−50 30 4K
Loftier Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−l 43 Hitman 3 45−50 45−l Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 30 Metro Exodus 25 26 Red Expressionless Redemption two 45−50 24 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 28 32 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47 51 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassinator'southward Creed Odyssey 27 28 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 24 Battlefield 5 47 53 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−fifty Far Cry 5 39 41 Far Weep New Dawn 42 42 Forza Horizon 4 55 59 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 17 Advantages and disadvantages
Operation rating 48.83 46.93 Novelty 2 November 2017 6 January 2019 Cost $399 $349 Fleck lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Bandage your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti past AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2060 by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1070-Ti-vs-GeForce-RTX-2060
0 Response to "Rtx 2060 Vs Gtx 1070 Ti"
Post a Comment